POINT OF VIEW
BY JOEL RUIMY
Fired
If former Ottawa Citizen publisher Russell Mills can get
sacked, then all journalists should
watch their backs
A day after news that CanWest Global
Communications Corp. had sacked Ottawa
Citizen Publisher Russell Mills, a former
managing editor of mine observed wryly that he
never thought he'd see the day a "band of reporters
would stick up for the publisher."
That's one of the minor — but telling — ways
journalism has changed in Canada since the start
of the current controversy surrounding CanWest
Global and its newspapers.The publisher was once
the proprietor's point man, and lightning rod for
the anger and the insecurity of the lower editorial
orders.That's one tradition out the window.Now,
in the case of Mills anyway, it's publisher as heroic
torchbearer for the truth.
And what an unlikely torchbearer. In his 31
years at the Citizen, Mills built a reputation as a
solid and careful
company man, never rocking the boat, always
turning a profit, connecting his newspaper to the
community.
Now,his dismissal is being portrayed
by CanWest as a labour-relations issue not relevant
to anyone but the employer, the employee and their
lawyers.Mills was fired because he failed to submit
in advance to CanWest headquarters in Winnipeg
a long story
and an editorial on the scandals enveloping the
Prime Minister.
Think whether there could be a
more ludicrous contention than that of saying the
publisher of a newspaper in the nation's capital,
where federal politics is the city's main industry,
can't on his own order a series on national politics?
Does a publisher in Vancouver have to ask
permission before tackling salmon or timber? Does
Montreal have to clear stories on Quebec
discredit and ridicule on our industry.
To the
uninitiated, this may well be seen as the way all
media companies operate. How can you trust
something that is being held up by its owners to
ridicule and contempt?
All of this has begun to fray at the ties of trust
binding a newspaper to its readers — and not just
at Southam. The perception that you can't trust
your newspaper has now gone mainstream.
Consumers ask, justifiably,how they can be certain
they're getting a balanced diet of fact and opinion
from seasoned professionals rather than from
owners pushing their own agenda? Witness the
3,000 subscription cancellations at the Citizen (at the
time this article was written) and the thousands
more at other newspapers in the chain. Ironically, a
boycott may well make things worse by weakening
these newspapers.
Angry readers may feel a cancelled subscription
is a concrete way to signal their displeasure. But it
may end up hurting the principle they most care
about — that of a strong media. The Canadian
Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE) recommends
letters and emails to CanWest instead. If CanWest
executives won't listen to their colleagues, their
former managers,other journalists, senators,PEN,
or the International Press Institute, maybe they'll
listen to their readers.
And if you don't work for Southam,you should
still be worried. The Aspers have turned the inner
workings of our business into a circus with their
ham-fisted handling of dissent within their own
newsrooms. The whole thing has been a terrible
embarassment for Canadian journalism, throwing
nationalism through head office?
The entire episode has changed many things,
including the way journalists do their job, the way
readers regard their daily newspapers, and the
perception about the integrity and reliability of
media in Canada today.
Let's start with the strong chill this sends
out through journalistic ranks, both at CanWest
and elsewhere. If a publisher, especially this
publisher, is not safe from head-office wrath, then
who is? Some Southam journalists admit quietly
that they think twice about writing anything that
might bring owner anger on their heads. In
addition to the Mills firing, there have been other
dismissals and suspensions of columnists whose
writings apparently offended CanWest
sensibilities.
Stories have been rewritten or spiked, with
management deriding the offending copy as
inaccurate or biased.Self-censorship — journalists
limiting themselves in what they say — is an issue
in much of the developing world,where your copy
can sometimes get you sacked,or worse.There is a
real threat now that self-censorship has come to
Canada.
Joel Ruimy is executive director of the
organization, Canadian Journalists for Free
Expression.